|
Comments: 26 | Prop Total: 84 | Avg: 3.23
|
|
| Photo | Video | News | Wall | |
|
(Jan 2, 2012 at 4:17)
(Below Threshold) show comment
Im confused, date says 2004-02-29, but it has pod in 2001?
|
|
|
|
@Borrocks
To ride downhill, you have to get uphill? Think about your logic, it hurt me to read how stupid it was when you mocked cycling up hill. |
|
I can understand mnorris if you have the correct colour bike, but in order to have these forks, your going to need a checker colour bike. And that would be even more disgusting!
|
|
|
Front disk brake rotor, but no brake... :p
|
|
Yeah I would take a fair few, got a lot of people who ride around here
|
|
|
|
Yeah weather was prime for this photo
|
|
Didn't want to be the person who's like, "ITS A FAKE, PHOTOSHOP YOU IDIOTS"
|
|
Looks like your both leaning on the ground
|
|
|
Whats up with the super stem length, that ain't right
|
|
This small frame, is too big for you? what
|
|
|
|
It also brings a huge amount of money instead of just having a mountain resort doing nothing whilst their is no snow
|
|
|
|
Anyone else think he's feeling pumped?
|
|
Not pod worthy to me, But still a picture which is different and nice
|
|
|
I can't think of a witty comment for this picture
|
|
|
About Us
ContactsAdvertise
AdvertisingCool Features
Pinkbike DailyRSS
Pinkbike RSS Feed